QUESTION: Shouldn't we be
loyal to the "original autographs" and not a mere translation?
ANSWER: We should put as much value
on the "originals" as God does.
EXPLANATION: It is impossible to be
true to the originals because the originals have long been lost. This
well established fact should be enough to make the
sincere student of Scripture realize that an affirmative answer to the
question is an impossibility.
But it does not explain the above answer. Just how much
value does God put on the originals?
To get the answer we must explore several chapters in
the book of Jeremiah beginning with the famous passage in chapter 36
concerning the roll that Jeremiah had written.
In verse 21 the roll is brought before King Jehoiakim
and read by his servant Jehudi.
According to verse 23 Jehudi read three or four leaves
and King Jehoiakim cut it up with a penknife and cast it into the fire
on the hearth until it was destroyed.
Thus ends ORIGINAL #1 !
Then the Lord moved Jeremiah to rewrite the roll adding
some words to it. (Jeremiah 36:32)
Thus ORIGINAL #2 is born.
We are shown the text of this second original in Jeremiah
45-51 where it is reproduced for our benefit.
Jeremiah told Seraiah to read this roll when he came into
Babylon. (Jeremiah 51:59-61) Then Jeremiah instructed Seraiah, after
he finished reading the roll, to bind a stone to it and cast
it into the Euphrates river (Jeremiah 51:63)!
Thus ends ORIGINAL #2!
But wait! We have a copy of the text of the roll in chapters
45-51. Where did it come from? It came from a copy of
original #2 which we can only call ORIGINAL #3!
So there are two very big problems for those who overemphasize
(1) Every Bible ever printed with a copy of Jeremiah in
it has a text in chapters 45-51 which is translated from a copy of the
"second" original, or ORIGINAL #3. (2) Secondly,
NO ONE can overlook the fact that God didn't have the least
bit of interest in preserving the "original"
once it had been copied and its message delivered. So WHY should we
put more of an emphasis on the originals than God does?
An emphasis which is plainly unscriptural.
Thus, since we have the text of the "originals"
preserved in the King James Bible we have no need of the originals,even
if they were available.